Public:BWmeta format/Feature requests
From YaddaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Division of bwmeta-core into smaller parts== | ==Division of bwmeta-core into smaller parts== | ||
MJ: I'd like to see bwmeta-core divided into smaller parts. Right now, I would like to use the data model ONLY, not all the dependencies | MJ: I'd like to see bwmeta-core divided into smaller parts. Right now, I would like to use the data model ONLY, not all the dependencies | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Categorizsation as a dag not a tree== | ||
| + | In BWMteat ccategorizations are trees. We should consider if they shouldn;t be DAGs. | ||
Revision as of 10:27, 1 February 2012
Contents |
Something in a contributor
- TODO: AN wanted to add some property to a contributor, but I don't remember what it was…
Subtitle linked to a title somehow
- JJ noticed that in the (very uncommon) case of multiple titles and subtitles in the same language it is impossible to guess which subtitle refers to which title.
Adding ID elements to persons and institutions
Person and institutions could heve extrernal id ( like zentrerblatt id - there is no possibilioty of specifing this in bwmeta MJ: I second that! Putting PESEL into attributes does not seem elegant
Division of bwmeta-core into smaller parts
MJ: I'd like to see bwmeta-core divided into smaller parts. Right now, I would like to use the data model ONLY, not all the dependencies
Categorizsation as a dag not a tree
In BWMteat ccategorizations are trees. We should consider if they shouldn;t be DAGs.
